Resources
English translation of KoSIF’s Korean content — the Korean version is the authoritative source.
Attachments
South Korea’s public financial institutions
provide substantial financing for overseas fossil fuel projects, yet the
greenhouse gas emissions associated with this support remain largely unmeasured
and undisclosed.
This report examines the financed emissions and long-term climate impacts associated with overseas fossil fuel finance approved by the Export-Import Bank of Korea (KEXIM), Korea Trade Insurance Corporation (K-SURE) and Korea Development Bank (KDB) between 2020 and 2024. It quantifies the scale of emissions associated with South Korean public finance and identifies the changes needed to bring public finance into alignment with the 1.5°C goal.
For financial institutions, the most
significant emissions lie not in their own Scope 1 and 2 emissions, but in financed
emissions, which fall under Scope 3.
Financed emissions alone, however, do not
capture the full climate impact of public finance. Once a financing arrangement
ends, the associated emissions are no longer attributed to the financial
institution. But fossil fuel infrastructure financed by public institutions can
continue operating and emitting greenhouse gases for decades.
To capture both the emissions associated
with public finance and the scale of long-term carbon lock-in, the report
examines three key measures:
·
Financed emissions based on
outstanding amounts in 2024
·
Committed emissions, or the
greenhouse gases that financed facilities are expected to emit over their
operating lifetimes
·
Emissions embodied in
transported fuels, covering the production and combustion emissions of fossil
fuels transported over the lifetimes of fossil fuel vessels, which make up the
majority of the assets analyzed
The analysis finds that facilities approved
for financial support by the three institutions over just five years are
expected to generate more than 2.9 billion tons in committed emissions. If
fossil fuel finance continues at current levels, financed emissions in 2030
would reach three times the level consistent with a 1.5°C pathway.
Fossil fuel vessels account for 91% of the
assets covered by the analysis. The production and combustion of the fuels
these vessels are expected to transport over their operating lifetimes would
generate emissions equivalent to 12.7% of the world’s remaining carbon budget
for 1.5°C.
The longer an end to new fossil fuel
finance is delayed, the further public finance moves away from a 1.5°C-aligned
pathway. Even if new financing ends, emissions from already-approved assets will
continue for decades. A 1.5°C-aligned transition therefore requires both an end
to new fossil fuel finance and active management of emissions from existing
assets.
The report calls for four priority actions:
1.
Immediately end new fossil fuel
finance
2.
Mandate financed emissions
disclosure and portfolio-level emissions reduction targets
3.
Establish strategies to manage
existing assets and accelerate their early retirement
4.
Redirect public finance and
institutional capacity toward renewable energy and decarbonization